National Cabinet shows there is a better way to do Government in Australia

The success of the National Cabinet’s operation during the pandemic could be a model for a better type of government,

By John Wren

On Monday 11 May ABC’s Q+A current affairs show (full episode linked below) featured the premiers of Australia’s three biggest states on its panel: Daniel Andrews of Victoria, Glady Berejiklian of NSW and Annastacia Palaszczuk of Queensland. Two Labor and one Liberal.

It was an important show for many reasons.

The National Cabinet has been working together effectively in putting citizens first (Screenshot via YouTube)

The states and territories have been doing the heavy lifting (all of them, not just the three above) during the pandemic. Australia’s success at keeping the virus under control is due to the excellent work being done by state employees under the leadership of the premiers and chief ministers and their local scientific and medical advisors.

The pandemic has exposed the Federal Government, at least this one under Prime Minister Scott Morrison anyway, as powerless and petulant. In many cases, it has attempted to directly undermine the authority of state premiers, particularly Victoria’s Daniel Andrews, who has emerged as the de facto national leader during the crisis. The Federal Government has shown itself to be more concerned about economics than the lives of Australians.

Given that the fundamental purpose of any government is the safety and wellbeing of its citizens, this has demonstrably been a major failure of the Morrison regime. Even as I write this, Morrison has marshalled his federal and state-based Liberal MPs to continue their attacks on Andrews. Unfortunately for Morrison, they are so childish and inept, all they do is degrade the already blemished reputation of the Liberal Party even further.

In Victoria with control freak wowsers like Dictator Dan running the show, you can’t even sit down for a coffee, let alone a beer. Our Premier is such a friendless loser, of course Victoria has no plans to reopen licensed venues,who would invite Lurch for a drink?#danhasnomates — Tim Smith MP (@TimSmithMP) May 13, 2020

Morrison was not mentioned once during the entire Q+A show, further demonstrating how irrelevant he is.

This begs the question: do we actually need a Federal Government? The answer, of course, is yes, for both constitutional as well as national interest reasons (such as defence, currency and international trade). However, we can do better.

Coronavirus Australia: How is your state's premier performing?
“The State premiers and Territory Chief Ministers, irrespectikve of Party affiliation, have in many ways been the heroes of Australia’s Covid 19 response.”

Australia has three levels of government — federal, state and local. There have been calls for years to remove a level of government and that has almost always been focused on the elimination of state and territory governments.

The COVID-19 crisis has suggested that perhaps it’s the Federal Government that needs reform.

Before I make my suggestion, I’d also like to add that Australia is long overdue becoming a republic. This tardiness is another legacy of John Howard’s miserable regime. Decades later, Howard’s toxic miasma still lingers over Australia, stifling the economy and our cultural development. To paraphrase former PM Paul Keating, no self-respecting nation has the flag of another on its own.

Our head of state (represented by the Governor-General) is a foreigner appointed for hereditary reasons rather than merit. It is also a requirement of this individual that they be an Anglican. In egalitarian secular Australia, this mechanism of itself is unAustralian, to say the least.

Scott Morrison created the National Cabinet as a way of presenting himself as being in charge during the crisis. He saw early on that he had no power in the crisis so “Scotty from Marketing” kicked in to create the cabinet. He then appointed himself as Chair and spokesperson. He could not compel the premiers to attend the cabinet. He has no power over them.

The cabinet, disregarding Morrison, has operated extremely well. The premiers and chief ministers (five Labor and three Liberal) have put their political differences aside and have worked together constructively to put their citizens first — all of them, not just the chosen few.

This is how governments should work. It has put Morrison’s corrupt federal rabble to shame. To a significant extent, the success of the National Cabinet has backfired on Morrison as it has exposed his failings as a leader in my opinion.

Wren’s Week: Time to reshape our political and economic model @IndependentAus — IndependentAustralia (@independentaus) April 3, 2020

So how can we persist with this model?

I propose the following.

We leave the Senate as is. It is a constitutional requirement. It also serves the purpose of holding the Federal Government to account. Its role as the “house of review” should remain.

We do not need a Federal Lower House. We will create a permanent National Cabinet to determine policy direction and submit legislation to the senate. This cabinet will be made up of the premier or chief minister from each state and territory, the deputy leader from each state and territory and a further eight members selected by the PM from state and territory parliaments based on their subject matter expertise. Twenty-four members in total. The 16 core members will elect the PM from their number. In order to make this work, state elections must be brought into line nationally with fixed four-year terms.

This federal cabinet will meet in Canberra four times a year for a month each time. There will, of course, be ad hoc meetings as circumstances dictate. The rest of the time, these cabinet members will function in their state and territory parliaments as normal. National Cabinet members will thus have dual roles often holding both national and state ministerial portfolios. The role of the senior public service as both advisors and implementers will remain critical at both state and federal levels.

I expect many critiques of my suggestion. I encourage it. The purpose is to start the conversation.

Most of us who have watched Australian politics over the last ten years will know that our political system is broken. We have had too many inept prime ministers held captive to extremist views. Corruption has run rampant, particularly over the last five years, further degrading the public perception of our political class.

Preferential voting must be replaced with a NZ-style mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) to ensure broader parliamentary representation. I’m no fan of the Greens, but it is not correct that they win ten per cent of the vote but gain only one seat in our 150 seat lower house.

Conversely, the Nationals win an even lower proportion of the vote yet hold a dozen seats. It’s quite simply undemocratic.

Of course, if the National Cabinet model I suggested above is adopted, then it would be the states who should adopt MMP.

To see a need for change and not work to address it is laziness. “She’ll be right” fixes nothing. The world is changed by those who show up.

Make sure you do.

First published at the IndependentAustralia Saturday 16 May 2020. See;,13899

3 thoughts on “National Cabinet shows there is a better way to do Government in Australia

  1. A bit biased are we? It seems the Prime Minister convened this national cabinet. But I guess the SCOMO haters will never give him credit for being inclusive or for anything else.

    Editors note: Sent in by Julian actually ‘Buster’in line with his own previous articles in relation to a debate to doing politics and democracy better in Australia. The usual response, that you have been told numerous times now, still applies. Namely send something in and as long as it is legal, not defamatory and of broad interest to our readers we will publish it. The email address is to be found under ‘Contact Us’ in the top left hand corner of the landing page.

    1. Geez Buster if you think the above is harsh the story at the following link will really do your head in as your hero Scotty from Marketing gets disceted and peeled like a prawn heading for someone’s lunch plate;,13912

      I dare you to engage with the actaul arguments therein though. That, after all would make for a pleasent change.

  2. Gee so quick and snarky are “Buster’s” interventions on anything on site to do with any presumed slight of his hero Scott Morrison that I’m seriously thinking his family name must be Morrison too.

    Is he really Scotty’s brother perhaps?

    On the issue raised in the article; “is there a better mode of governance, way of doing politics” overall In Australia? Yes, definitely, the constitution was great for it’s time and probably for 110 out of the 120 years it has been around but the decline in the two party vote, a dissatisfaction with politicians and politics as currently practiced means people are looking for change that empowers them more than just voting every three or four years. Now whether that is the model the writer suggests is moot.

    I personally think proportional representation needs to be seriously considered for all levels of government and that citizens referendums be used a bit more also. Of course that would require a change to the constitution and would the two main parties agree to such moves when they may threaten their current positions of power? Doubtful unfortunately, but still well worth the debate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Coffs Coast Outlook - Your alternative Coffs Coast voice
+ +