Local, Opinion/Comment

Is Council’s announced “profit” really just a “Clayton’s profit”?

On Monday of this week Coffs Coast Outlook was alerted to the fact that tonight’s Council agenda features the draft accounts for the CHCC for the 2019-20 financial year.

By The Editor and Rob Steurmann

And in those accounts it is proudly announced that a net operating ‘profit’ of $21.55m has been made. Sounds great doesn’t it?

But then underneath that grandiose statement is this little ‘rider’;

‘Net operating results for the year before grants and contributions provided for capital purposes ($16.457m)’.

Those closed brackets dear reader signify an underlying operational loss for the 2019-20 financial year.

So is the operational result (profit) announced a ‘Clayton’s profit’? ‘The profit you have when you don’t have a profit’?

We are inclined to answer yes to that question.

Cr Sally Townley

And it would appear Councillor Sally Townley agrees with us.

Dr Townley is quoted today by the Coffs Coast Advocate as saying; “The final position appears considerably worse than expected. While some loss can be attributed to COVID, the final position is also offset by some very large and in some cases unexpected grants.”

The so called operating ‘profit’ is fluffed up over the last quarter of the financial year by grants that flowed in, often un-requested, as a result of State and Federal Government largesse largely due to Covid 19 and the Bushfire Crisis.

There was a $500,00 grant from the State Government for library purposes but contrary to Council’s media spin that was not due to the CCS in Gordon Street or any other similar reason. Pretty much all regional NSW Councils got that grant!

Oh yeah and there was some money from an airport screening fund too, although not a monumental amount

No, the profit announced is not due to managerial wizardry and foresight. It has nothing to do with that.

Without those grants the net operating position would have been a loss of $16.45m.

Sure Covid 19 would have a bit to do with that. But also hidden away in the 108 pages of accounts our Councillors are expected to wade through for tonight’s meeting is a line item which states ‘loss on sale of asset(s) of $15,334m.

We hear you ask; “Huh? What assets, when were they sold, why at such a loss?”

Well apparently according to the fine print they were; “significant one-off adjustments recognised through the revaluation of transport and stormwater drainage infrastructure assets and demolition of some property assets.”

And all adding up to $15.334 million in net losses.

So what is the long story in short? The real operating situation, minus one off special grants, is a net loss of $16.45m.

That is a gap of $38m between the anounced ‘profit’ and the net underlying loss of 16.45m

Council’s executive really does need to be grilled by all eight Councillors tonight over this. Not just Cr Townley.

————————-

And then there is the airport

Councillors are also being asked to make a decision on the lease of the Coffs Harbour Airport tonight too

On the airport Councillors are being asked to choose from a range of options ranging from maintaing the status quo, appointing an airport management group, deferring any lease decision for approximately five years through to leasing the airport for 99 years, the latter effectively being privatisation (although land ownership would be maintained by Council).

The key thing to remember is that the Council Executive have made no recommendation to Councillors tonight.

Could it be that in this extremely depressed aviation market there was only one bidder, or none even, to lease the airport long term? Could it be that any bid(s) were a lot lower than what was anticipated or wanted?

If that supposition is correct then Councillors need to consider deferring the lease process at the very least. Certainly not leasing it for what for many of us would be an eternity.

It is important to remember that the airport makes a profit of $3.5 – $4m a year in good years.

Leasing it for 99 years now, given what may well be a low response rate to the leasing tender is akin to a ‘fire sale.’

See; https://coffscoastoutlook.com.au/?p=35769

2 Comments

  1. This clearly is deliberate deception with the belief by Council’s Executive that it can, without recourse, continually maintain attempts to fool the ratepayers.

    The recent Straw Poll conducted by “Coffs Coast Independent News” revealed an overwhelming NO CONFIDENCE in the GM Steven McGrath together with the Mayor. It simply speaks volumes about mistrust and financial mismanagement. So what are the people of Coffs Harbour expected to do ? Sit back and put up with another year of shambollocks ? Seems people don’t believe so.

    Let’s not further beat about the bush with eloquence – Councillors now have a prime duty to stand down the General Manager and persons responsible for the rubbery accounts.

    And what about the expected ultimate findings in respect of the waste management legal saga where it looks like CHCC may have to cough-up >$30,000,000 !! This deserves a “please explain” Mr McGrath.

  2. This council executive exudes all of the characteristics of players in the entertainment field.

    Among their many talents, they possess great creativity; they’re masters of illusion and deception; proficient at sleight of hand; marvelous at magic; able to walk tightropes without netting; magnificent on the high-wire; and last but not least; make a great bunch of bumbling clowns.

    All they need now is a big-top. Or is that what they’re proposing for Gordon Street?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*